“If, as seems to be the case, it is a rare and costly object as difficult to produce as a battleship, it is likelier to put an end to large-scale wars at the cost of prolonging indefinitely a ‘peace that is no peace’.”
Orwell’s piece is somewhat ironic. He talks a lot about other countries, like Russia, obtaining the secret to creating the Atomic Bomb, and how devastating that could be for the rest of man-kind, but does not even hint at the fact that just two months prior, the USA dropped two atomic bombs on innocent people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. This quote fails to mention that dropping the atom bomb could cause thousands, if not millions, of casualties because the effects of radiation would go on for generations. It is true that dropping the bombs did spark the beginning of the end of World War II, but it also sparked the beginning of the Cold War.
Personally, I think that dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was unnecessary. We easily could have dropped regular bombs on different parts of Japan and have gotten the same message across. The radiation emitted from the two bombs effected generations long after the war itself ended. It is like the Treaty of Versailles after World War I; the conditions in the treaty would have effected Germany for generations after the war. I am not saying that I am siding with Japan, but they had the dignity to attack a military base; we attacked innocent people. Yes, it put the United States in “first place” when it comes to weaponry, but at what cost? I wish they had come up with a different solution because in the long run, the cons definitely outweighed the pros.